Enthalpy Evaluation Information Page

Broad definition of what we are considering

We are considering conceptual videos focused on the enthalpy of chemical reactions and what impacts the variability of energy change associated with the chemical reactions. We are not actively including other changes such as phase changes.

We are not focused on videos that exclusively focus on the skill of calculating the ΔH rxn or a specific quantity of heat associated with a reactions occurring.

Gas Law Specific Criteria

Element Examples
Macroscopic Ice pack, thermite reaction, other macroscopic/energy changing reactions
Symbolic Chemical equation, often with delta H showing endo or exothermic. Lewis structures for substances, often specifically highlighting the bonds between atoms being broken or formed. Reaction coordinate diagram. Enthalpy diagram.
Particulate Showing reactant molecules and bonds breaking and new bonds forming to give products. Showing two atoms coming together forming a bond OR two atoms moving away from each other showing a bond breaking ONLY IF it is connected to energy.
Connection between levels Videos should make explicit connections between two or more levels for this to be coded as present. For example, they directly connect a macroscopic example to the reaction coordinate diagram by linking the heat released/absorbed to the relative positions of reactants and products or they show how the bonds rearranging link to energy changes on a diagram.
Core Ideas Elements
Change and Stability in Chemical Systems Energy
Energy and entropy changes, the rates
of competing processes, and the
balance between opposing forces
govern the fate of chemical systems.

Energy changes are either the cause or the consequence of change
in chemical systems, which can be considered on different scales
and can be accounted for by the conservation of the total energy
of the system of interest and the surroundings.

Video needs to include:
  • Systems progress toward lower energy states. This means that systems that undergo exothermic processes (release chemical potential energy) will be favorable.
Video needs to include:
E1: The overall energy change in a reaction depends on the
amount of energy that needs to be put in to break bonds and the
amount of energy given off when new bonds are formed. [This is
focused on bond energy.]

Additionally, please watch the video from 4:00 to 5:30 for further context.


OR

E2: The overall energy change in a reaction depends on the
energy differences between the products and the reactants. If the
products are higher in energy than reactants, energy needs to be
added to the system. If the reactants are higher in energy than the
products, energy is released to the surroundings. [This is focused
on total energy of reactants vs. products.]

Must have Both How and Why!

Option 1:What results in an exo or endothermic reaction? -bond energy How: If the products have weaker bonds than the reactants, energy will need to be put into the system and the reaction will be endothermic (and vice versa). Why: Energy is required to break bonds and released when bonds are formed. If more energy is needed to break bonds in the reactants than is released when new bonds are formed, the reaction will be endothermic (and vice versa). Note: Only talking about energy associated with a single bond forming or breaking will not reach the level of CMR.

Additionally, please watch the above video segment from 3:33 to 4:12.

Option 2:What results in an exo or endothermic reaction? -molecular potential energy

How: If the products are higher in energy than the reactants, energy will need to be put into the system and the reaction will be endothermic (and vice versa).

Why: Stronger bonds are lower in chemical potential energy and require more energy to break and/or release more energy when they are formed. If the reactants have overall stronger bonds, they will be lower in CPE and thus the reaction will be endothermic (or vice versa).

Must address both aspects of the why.

Most Frequent Science Practices
SP 2: Developing and Using Models
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon for instructor/students to explain or make a prediction about.
  • Instruction presents a representation or asks instructor/students to construct a representation.
  • Instruction has instructor/students explain or make a prediction about the event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide the reasoning that links the representation to their explanation or prediction.
SP 4: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
  • Instruction presents a scientific question, claim, or hypothesis to be investigated.
  • Instruction provides a representation of data (table, graph, or list of observations) used to answer the question or test the claim or hypothesis.
  • Instruction provides an analysis of the data or asks instructor/students to analyze the data.
  • Instruction has instructor/students interpret the results or assess the validity of the conclusions in the context of the scientific question, claim, or hypothesis.
SP 5: Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students perform a calculation or statistical test, generate a mathematical representation, or demonstrate a relationship between parameters.
  • Instruction has instructor/students give a consequence or an interpretation in words, diagrams, symbols, or graphs of their mathematical results while demonstrating reasoning in the context of the given event, observation, or phenomenon.
SP 6: Constructing Explanations and Engaging in Argument from Evidence
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction presents or asks instructor/students to make a claim based on the given event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide scientific principles or evidence (data or observations) to support the claim.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide reasoning about why the scientific principles or evidence support the claim.


Additionally, please watch the video from 1:45 to 2:33 for further context.

Multimedia learning as knowledge construction: The goal of multimedia presentations is not only to present information but also to provide guidance for how to process the presented information – that is, for determining what to pay attention to, how to mentally organize it, and how to relate it to prior knowledge. We will categorize the videos along each of the following criteria (High and Low should be mutually exclusive.)

High Low
  • Video almost exclusively involves meaningful
    and relevant
    images and verbal components
    AND images are explained for a novice
    learner
  • Text on screen is minimal (ex. Only brief
    bullet points or keywords or definitions if text
    is used)
  • Content is all relevant to the topic and learning
    (no music, unhelpful animations, graphics,
    etc.)
  • Contains elements that meaningfully support
    student organizing content or identify key
    ideas (introductory organizer, section heading,
    summary, guiding questions/topic (for short,
    focused video only) Key Question: Could a
    novice learner clearly understand what they
    should take away from the video? Yes=high.




  • Large segments of video are presented just
    verbally and not pictorially (ex. just the
    instructor talking, or just written words) OR
    images presented are not relevant to learning
    or explained.
  • Contains full sentences of written text that are
    also narrated (e.g., several bullet points or
    sentences on one screen OR full sentences of
    text on many screens includes forced closed
    captioning)
  • Contains extraneous content, music, graphics,
    animations, background changes, sounds, or
    just too much stuff on the screen at one time -
    anything that detracts attention from core
    content
  • Does not contain any elements that
    meaningfully help learners organize content or
    identify key ideas (e.g., no introductory
    organizer, section headings, video segments,
    summary, guiding question/topic (for short
    focused videos only)
  • Several minor spelling issues is misleading, not inaccurate
  • Indicating that bonds “store” energy is categorized as misleading if only casually mentioned. If this is strongly repeated, this may evaluate to inaccurate.
  • Videos with full on-screen captions (that can not be removed) are considered “low”. for multimedia when considering text usage.

Exemplar Video 1

Exemplar Video 2

Exemplar Video 3 - this video must be watched on YouTube
Comments

Short discussion of the energy differences between endo and exothermic reactions. Very clearly focused on the energy being tied to the bonds that are being broken and formed and how the balance between the two determines end vs. exo.

Drew reaction coordinate diagrams to explain.

Comments

Enthalpy of reaction - amount of energy being emitted or taken in during a chemical reaction as a result of bonds being broken and formed.

Gives example of nitroglycerin as an exothermic reaction (shows molecule), then talks about dynamite - stabilizes nitroglycerine by wrapping it.

Flow chart looks at amount of energy required to break bonds in reactants and the amount released when new bonds form in products and connects that to endo and exothermic reactions.

Talks about thermite reaction and shows energy diagram for the reaction (exothermic reaction). Shows enthalpy diagram.

If you turn the reaction around, enthalpy is the same amount but opposite sign.

Gives example of dissolution of ammonium nitrate. Moves to Born-Haber cycle and how it is a bunch of small reactions - example if making LiF out of Li and F2 gas - does not talk about what makes different parts endo or exothermic.

4:36-7:20 is Hess' law problem. Did you learn is the end part.

Comments

Explains enthalpy and that we measure change in enthalpy, not enthalpy.

Shows a neutralization reaction on a reaction coordinate diagram and an endo reaction.

Strengths

This lesser viewed video pulls together a strong conceptual description of endothermic and exothermic reactions.

The video clearly articulates the energy changes associated with both bond making and breaking. In doing so, it makes strong connections between the symbolic and particulate representations.

Throughout the video, the narrator uses the core idea of energy with enough depth that met the Causal Mechanistic Reasoning expectations when answering the question “What results in an exo or endothermic reaction?”

The video itself was strong in all aspects of Mayer’s multimedia principles that were assessed.

Strengths

This video provides a very good summary of how the balance of energy required to break and form bonds results in the net change in energy.

The video provides macroscopic examples and links those to the symbolic graphical representations of an energy diagram.

In providing the description, the video employs the Energy core idea and does so in enough depth to achieve a Causal Mechanistic Reasoning answer.

The video also provides a reminder of the key expected learning outcomes at the end.

Strengths

This video begins with very clearly articulated learning objectives.

The video addresses the concept of enthalpy by defining it and provides a representation of the macroscopic impacts that enthalpy can have (changing temperature as a result of a chemical reaction).

Lastly, the video takes an in-depth look at the reaction energy diagram and shows the difference in representation between an exothermic and endothermic reaction, including activation energy.

The video effectively addresses the idea of Energy as a core idea as well as using the Science Practice of constructing explanations to explain why neutralization reactions are exothermic.

Weaknesses

Because the video did not bring in a real world phenomena, it did not meet the criteria for Science Practices.

Right at the beginning of the video, there was one potentially misleading part where it was stated that molecules could not react if we did not add heat.

Although activation energy is indeed required for reactions, it is often the case where ambient temperature provides enough energy for the reaction to proceed without additional heat.

Weaknesses

Throughout the video, the narrator can be seen on screen which can be distracting for some viewers.

The video also contains a significant section on Hess’s Law.

This is used through the process of rearranging and adding equations to determine the change in enthalpy for a reaction.

Although nothing is incorrect, this aspect was outside of the broader conceptual focus defined for this topic.

Weaknesses

The video itself has the speaker shown constantly and has captions directly on the video (cannot be turned off).

Each of these can be distracting for some students.

The video also lacks the level of depth to achieve causal mechanistic reasoning.

In many ways, the video seems to focus more on being able to draw out the reaction coordinate diagram rather than fully understanding the concepts behind it.

Click below to download a PDF version: