Entropy Evaluation Information Page

Gas Law Specific Criteria

Element Examples
Macroscopic Examples of phase changes (e.g., ice melting, water freezing). Demonstrations of entropy changes in physical and chemical processes (e.g., mixing of gases, dissolution of salts in water, dispersal of dye in water, increase in volume of a gas, dispersion of gases in combustion reaction). To be classified as a macroscopic example there must be some kind of explicit connection to entropy. Just saying that bananas rotting is driven by entropy is not enough.
Symbolic Chemical equations showing entropy changes (e.g., phase changes, reactions). Graphs or diagrams illustrating entropy changes (e.g., Boltzman distributions graph, entropy vs. temperature graphs, energy distribution diagrams). Equations involving entropy (e.g., ΔS, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS).
Particulate Particle diagrams showing the distribution of particles in different states (e.g., solid, liquid, gas). Illustrations of increased number of different arrangements at the particulate level (e.g., mixing of different colored particles to represent mixing of gases, or showing particles with different speeds/energies or positions/orientations). Note: particle representation of balanced chemical equation does not count here.
Connection between levels Videos should make explicit connections between two or more levels for this to be coded as present. For example, they could show a macroscopic example of a gas expanding and connect it to particle diagrams showing increased disorder and symbolic representations of entropy change.

Core Ideas Elements
Change and Stability in Chemical Systems Particulate Nature of Matter Energy
Energy and entropy changes, the rates of competing processes, and the balance between opposing forces govern the fate of chemical systems. Matter is comprised of individual particles and it is through interactions of these individual particles that materials exhibit their properties and undergo chemical reactions. Entropy is related to the distribution of energy. The more ways energy can be dispersed, the higher the entropy.

Increase in temp = increase in entropy
Video needs to include:
  • Systems progress toward more probable states where matter and energy are more distributed. Thus, systems tend toward increasing entropy.
Video needs to include:
  • Entropy is related to the distribution of matter. The more ways that the matter can be arranged, the higher the entropy.
Video needs to include:

Must have Both How and Why!

Option 1.1: What causes entropy changes in a system?

How: Increasing temperature will result in greater dispersal of energy.

Why: Increased temperature results in more energy levels/energy states being accessed which allows for more potential ways to disperse the energy.

Option 1.2: What causes entropy changes in a system?

How: Reactions can change the number of particles.

Why: A greater number of particles will increase the number of possible arrangements/positions (increase number of microstates) which allows for greater dispersal of matter. (or vice versa)

Option 1.3: What causes entropy changes in a system?

How: Phase changes and mixing of compounds will result in changes of volumes that particles can move in.

Why: Larger volumes allow for a larger number of possible positions/arrangements for particles (which leads to more microstates). This results in greater entropy for mixed systems or for gases over liquids over solids.

Option 2: What is the effect of molecular complexity on entropy?

How: More complex molecules have more possible ways to arrange their atoms and bonds, leading to a higher number of microstates.

Why: The increased number of microstates corresponds to higher entropy because there are more possible configurations for the particles. Complex molecules contribute to greater disorder due to their varied structures.

Option 3: What is the role of entropy in causing chemical/physical processes to occur?

How: In spontaneous processes the entropy of the system increases.

Why: When energy is more evenly distributed/dispersed among particles, the system is more stable. [I.e., more particles = greater potential to disperse energy; more flexibility = greater potential to disperse energy] OR there is a higher probability that the system will be in a state where energy is most evenly distributed

Most Frequent Science Practices
SP 2: Developing and Using Models
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon for instructor/students to explain or make a prediction about.
  • Instruction presents a representation or asks instructor/students to construct a representation.
  • Instruction has instructor/students explain or make a prediction about the event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide the reasoning that links the representation to their explanation or prediction.

SP 4: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
  • Instruction presents a scientific question, claim, or hypothesis to be investigated.
  • Instruction provides a representation of data (table, graph, or list of observations) used to answer the question or test the claim or hypothesis.
  • Instruction provides an analysis of the data or asks instructor/students to analyze the data.
  • Instruction has instructor/students interpret the results or assess the validity of the conclusions in the context of the scientific question, claim, or hypothesis.
SP 5: Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students perform a calculation or statistical test, generate a mathematical representation, or demonstrate a relationship between parameters.
  • Instruction has instructor/students give a consequence or an interpretation in words, diagrams, symbols, or graphs of their mathematical results while demonstrating reasoning in the context of the given event, observation, or phenomenon.

SP 6: Constructing Explanations and Engaging in Argument from Evidence
  • Instruction presents an event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction presents or asks instructor/students to make a claim based on the given event, observation, or phenomenon.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide scientific principles or evidence (data or observations) to support the claim.
  • Instruction has instructor/students provide reasoning about why the scientific principles or evidence support the claim.

Multimedia learning as knowledge construction: The goal of multimedia presentations is not only to present information but also to provide guidance for how to process the presented information – that is, for determining what to pay attention to, how to mentally organize it, and how to relate it to prior knowledge. We will categorize the videos along each of the following criteria (High and Low should be mutually exclusive.)

High Low
  • Video almost exclusively involves meaningful
    and relevant
    images and verbal components
    AND images are explained for a novice
    learner
  • Text on screen is minimal (ex. Only brief
    bullet points or keywords or definitions if text
    is used)
  • Content is all relevant to the topic and learning
    (no music, unhelpful animations, graphics,
    etc.)
  • Contains elements that meaningfully support
    student organizing content or identify key
    ideas (introductory organizer, section heading,
    summary, guiding questions/topic (for short,
    focused video only) Key Question: Could a
    novice learner clearly understand what they
    should take away from the video? Yes=high.




  • Large segments of video are presented just
    verbally and not pictorially (ex. just the
    instructor talking, or just written words) OR
    images presented are not relevant to learning
    or explained.
  • Contains full sentences of written text that are
    also narrated (e.g., several bullet points or
    sentences on one screen OR full sentences of
    text on many screens includes forced closed
    captioning)
  • Contains extraneous content, music, graphics,
    animations, background changes, sounds, or
    just too much stuff on the screen at one time -
    anything that detracts attention from core
    content
  • Does not contain any elements that
    meaningfully help learners organize content or
    identify key ideas (e.g., no introductory
    organizer, section headings, video segments,
    summary, guiding question/topic (for short
    focused videos only)

Analogies

Analogies vs. Macroscopic Example

Physics/Chemistry Definition of Microstate a specific arrangement or configuration of all the individual particles (atoms, molecules, etc.) within a system at a particular instant in time. It’s a snapshot of the system at the most fundamental level, detailing the precise locations and energy levels of each particle. Macrostate is physical property.

Examples of ball rolling down hill and not rolling all the way back up because of loss of energy to friction, air resistance – transfer of energy to surroundings.

Analogies Include:

A messy room which if approached from the perspective of only a few ways to arrange an ordered room but many ways to arrange disordered room is fine but if approached from ordered room is low entropy and messy room is high entropy then saying misleading.

Using results of multiple dice was deemed an analogy total of 2 dice = macrostate and individual ways to get to each some = “microstates”

Misleading

Describing entropy exclusively as randomness was not labeled as misleading, even though it is an inaccurate and incomplete interpretation of entropy.

These are examples of videos that were found to provide good illustrations of some or many of the framework components for this concept. Develop a deep understanding of chemistry concepts requires multiple experiences with the material and these videos may provide one such experience.


Exemplar Video 1

Exemplar Video 2

Exemplar Video 3
Comments

Starts with messy room analogy and says while it is easy to see and understand, it is misleading. Prior knowledge: energy is quantized and definition of system and surroundings. Learning Objectives: Describe the concept of a microstate and discuss what entropy measures conceptually.

Examples of spontaneous processes - definition. Gives pictures of spontaneous processes. Specific example - inflated balloon that has not been tied and is then let go. Gas that was in the balloon is now dispersed. Then food dye dispersing in water. Then hot pan cooling. 2nd law.

Defines it in words and symbols. Measure of the number of ways energy can be distributed in a system of molecules. Uses dice analogy to talk about microstates (ways you can get to) for each macrostate (sum of 2 dice). Heat transfer example - one heated to 60°C and the other at room temperature. When you push them together, they equilibrate. Shows thermal imaging and connects this to the 2nd law equation.

Comments

Started with looking at dye dissolving in water through an analogy, then moved to actual dye. Followed up with a good example of how dye molecules will be more likely to disperse based on probability, including with Boltzmann calculations.

Hit on how temperature impacts entropy. Discussed how systems might get more ordered (e.g., water freezing, iron rusting). Lastly discussed concept of Gibbs Free Energy and the equation.

Comments

Entropy is related to microstates. Considers n moles of gas at a given P, V, and T. Macroscopically, nothing is changing. Particulate level: particles can be in different positions and velocities at any given time. Shows 3 possible states of 4 particles (3 microstates).

Microstate = microscopic arrangement of all positions and energies of gas particles. Shows the equation that relates entropy to the number of microstates. If W (microstates) increases, S increases. Described as increase in disorder or dispersal of matter or energy.

Uses diagrams to explain entropy change in various cases: increasing volume, increasing temperature, gas reactions with changing moles. Excellent explanation of particle speed distribution and entropy. Summarizes: more microstates → positive entropy change.

Strengths

This video addresses every aspect of Johnstone’s Triangle and makes clear connections between levels. Uses dice probability analogy to explain macro/microstates and incorporates opportunities for self-assessment.

Applies science practices (Developing Models, Using Math/Computational Thinking) to explain energy. Strong causal explanation of temperature equilibration with models, numbers, and microstates.

Covers entropy topics including 2nd law, microstates, entropy calculations. High multimedia quality: low extraneous load, well-structured, and focused on key concepts for learning.

Strengths

Begins with M&M analogy for mixing, extends to dye in water. Provides particulate models and explains behavior based on microstates and probability, meeting science practice expectations.

Explores water freezing with a quantitative entropy calculation and real-world interpretation. Covers core ideas: Change & Stability, Energy, Particulate Nature of Matter. Includes a question prompt for engagement.

Strengths

Effectively connects symbolic and particulate levels using simple diagrams. Gives specific examples with clear representation of entropy changes (e.g., increasing volume, temperature, number of moles, or evaporation).

Meets science practice expectations using models and causal reasoning. Emphasizes that increasing disorder = increasing microstates. Clean, focused delivery without distracting effects.

Weaknesses

Examples of spontaneous processes are given early but not connected to entropy until around the 6-minute mark. Captions are missing for about 2 minutes, disadvantaging some learners.

At 13 minutes, it’s a bit long, which may lead to students skipping parts.

Weaknesses

Lower scores on multimedia evaluation for text and coherence. Text stays on screen too long and the constantly shifting background may distract learners.

Weaknesses

Whiteboard-style video sometimes gets visually cluttered due to underlining and circling. Lacks structural organization (e.g., intro, section breaks, summary).

Refers to particles as “microscopic” when technically they are sub-microscopic. Minor, but worth refining for scientific accuracy.